skip navigation

 

SELF-STUDY PROCESS

SELF-STUDY PLAN 2000-2003

NEWSLETTERS

PREPARATORY REVIEW REPORT

EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW

DATA PORTFOLIOS / EVIDENCE

VISITATION TEAM REPORTS

WASC COMMISSION ACTIONS

REPOSITORY

HOME - Title Page

 

Theme 2: Becoming a Safe, Supportive and Welcoming Campus Community and Physical Environment


Report on Issue No. 4: Availability of Technology to Assist Students and Operations

Ten years ago, the major technological issue facing the campus was the selection and implementation of e-mail. Questions such as who should have access, hours of operation, staffing, passwords, etc. were of eminent concern. Computer labs existed conceptually - the room was makeshift and used monitors that frequently malfunctioned. The universal complaints voiced most frequently were related to the computer lab; there was no staffing and the hours of operation were consistently inconsistent. Telecommunications primarily consisted of phone service. Data connections existed, but not to every office, nor every building. Two-way compressed video did not exist. Instead, one-way video and two-way audio was implemented using intermittent microwave communications between CSUSB and Palm Desert. On many occasions signals could not reach the destination site because palm trees impeded the signals. Media Services consisted primarily of delivering overhead projectors to classrooms (over 14,000 deliveries annually) along with public address installations university-wide. Students preparing for teacher certification would demonstrate their media expertise by threading 16 mm film projectors and "burning" overhead transparencies. Words such as "key-stoning," used to convey overhead projection distortion, and the "revelation method" of selectively revealing the information projected onto the screen, were all in vogue.

Many of the tools we take for granted today did not exist. Wireless, voice over IP, fiber optics, two-way audio and video, computer-based instruction, multi-casting, calendar scheduling, photographic software, digital cameras, instructional software (WebCT, Blackboard), laptop or notebook computers, discipline specific computer labs (except for computer science and information decision sciences), PowerPoint presentations, cell phones, touch tone registration, web-based registration and grades, on-line journals, online indices and abstracts, and much, much more were not available.

In the past ten years information technology has imbued virtually every segment of our university. Many of our operations are founded on technological principles. Today every division/college has it own technological staff, and almost every employee has his or her own computer workstation and in some instances more than one. Assistance in the development of course instructional materials is readily available. The John M. Pfau Library subscribes to over 16,000 journals on line, and over one million "hits" are made to the Library's home page monthly. The number and sophistication of IT staff university-wide continues to expand and become increasingly complex. Along with new technologies, capabilities, and capacities come new concerns and increasingly intrusive problems. Our technology has spawned new disciplines and positions, and has re-shaped much of our world. Information security today is an international phenomenon. We are cognizant that the security of our information systems is as important as the security of our buildings and staff.

We have had many milestones during the last decade, but the reality is that we've only just begun this technological sojourn. In this beginning of the 21st Century, technology advances faster than we can implement. And as "new" technologies continue to emerge, we must carefully and thoughtfully consider what will bring the most value to the university. We've come a long way in the last ten years, but perhaps the single most important lesson we've learned is to recognize that even the longest of journeys begins with an initial step.

The Technology Strategic Planning Committee (TSPC) was established in Fall 2000 to advise the President on strategic directions for technology in support of the University's mission. As a result of the committee's recommendation, the Technology Advisory Council (TAC) was formed a year later that would continue the work of the TSPC by recommending technology directions and policies for CSUSB and serving as a conduit for keeping the campus current on information technology issues. The TAC worked diligently during AY 2001/02 to develop a comprehensive technology strategic plan that would address the technology needs of students, faculty, staff, and administrators. Campus senior management approved the plan during Summer 2002. (The full plan is available on the CSUSB TAC Web-Site at: http://irt.csusb.edu/tac )

The vision established by the TAC is that:

CSUSB will become known as a regional comprehensive university with highly effective, state-of-the-art technologies to facilitate the University's vision for achieving and sustaining academic leadership and excellence in teaching, learning, and scholarship; to empower people of the region by facilitating the understanding and effective use of technology through partnerships and other community support activities. The CSUSB mission for technology is to provide a robust, secure, and reliable application of technology in support of the educational (institutional) goals and objectives of the University by offering a flexible learning environment through efficient, effective, and timely access to information and services.

While the first draft of the Technology Strategic Plan was written in Spring 2002, the campus has made much progress in meeting the teaching and learning needs of faculty and students. A large number of accomplishments are available on the IRT Division web site, http://irt.csusb.edu/, and highlights are outlined as follows:

  • The campus currently has 121 Smart Classrooms, with another 10 planned for availability Fall 2003.
  • CSUSB is leading the CSU in the development and implementation of the Telecommunications Infrastructure Initiative (TII). This project will provide 100mb connection, and enable the campus to move to voice, data, and video over a single line (VoIP).
  • Wireless technology is now available in Student Housing Residence Halls, the Student Union Events Center, and throughout several academic departments.
  • The campus operating system was upgraded in December 2001 to improve the speed, performance, and reliability of the campus network.
  • The campus hired an Information Security Officer in July 2000, and through US Department of Education Title V funds, the campus infrastructure and information is being secured and staff members are being trained in information and network security.
  • Remote Learning Centers (RLC) are being established at several community colleges in remote places throughout San Bernardino County through a US Department of Education Title V grant. This grant allows CSUSB students to take part in classes via distributed learning from remote sites, saving them time and gasoline.
  • The Office of Distributed Learning (ODL) is committed to the development of programs leading to degrees or certificates and delivered through distributed learning avenues.
  • CSUSB was the first of 11 CSU campuses to go live with a Common Management System (CMS) that provides more effective human resources information management and financial records. The student records project is on hold; however, an interim solution is being implemented which will expand the capabilities of the current SIS+ system.
  • The Assistive Computing Resources Center was established (2001) to meet the needs of students, faculty, and staff with disabilities and make recommendations for assistive technology solutions to their needs.
  • The Teaching Resource Center, University Librarians, and faculty are working collaboratively to develop information literacy among faculty and students.
  • More than 250 courses are now available on-line through Blackboard and Web CT; over 100 faculty were engaged in pedagogical review of course material and worked with administrative staff to design and prepare course materials.
  • The Pfau Library has made a number of enhancements that provide additional benefit to the campus community. Students and faculty may reserve materials electronically, remotely; students may renew materials online; and access to 2,417 on-line databases offer 16,000 full text periodicals. PHAROS, part of the Unified Information Access System of the CSU Libraries, will expand access to all CSU resources, and is expected to be implemented Fall 2003.
  • Feasibility study being conducted for renovation of original Pfau Library building and addition of a second wing.
  • Students may access their class confirmations, grades, and PAWS reports electronically via a secured server.

In the CSUSB Technology Strategic Plan, the TAC established a number of General Recommendations (to be carried out over a period of two to three years). They are divided into six categories and are outlined as follows:

Fundamental Recommendations

  • Faculty, staff, and students shall have equal opportunities to access and use technologies. CSUSB has a diverse student population with varying needs. Each technology decision needs to address these issues of diversity. This may range from adaptive technologies to time and geographical restrictions, to socio-economic and cultural contexts.
  • All university information systems should recognize individual privacy rights.
  • Continue to develop digital information and replace paper distribution.
  • Continue to maximize the benefits of collaborative decision-making and student services that technology makes possible.
  • All university information systems shall be integrated and maintained with reasonable system security, redundancy, and disaster recovery measures.

CSUSB Uniqueness

  • Teacher preparation for effective use of technology in the classroom will be addressed. As the major provider of the region's teachers, CSUSB must commit itself to preparing teachers to use technology for effective teaching and learning. Programs such as the "Preparing Tomorrow's Teachers to Use Technology" are an important first step.
  • CSUSB will distinguish itself in its monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of technology in teaching and learning in all colleges on campus.

Distance Learning

  • CSUSB will expand distance-learning formats to include complete courses and/or degree programs.
  • Remote students will have access to student services that are comparable to those afforded to on-campus students.
  • Information technology has blurred the distinction between classroom-based education and distance education. On-site campus learners and remote learners should be insured of equal quality of instruction, although the array of teaching and learning technologies may vary.

Training

  • Students, faculty, and staff will be provided with opportunities to develop technology competency and information literacy skills. Technology has become a part of every aspect of the university's mission. Every member of the university community must meet standards of locating, evaluating, organizing, and communicating information for problem solving. This requires that policy-makers, administrators and staff be technologically literate and support exemplary adoption of academic technologies; that all faculty are able to use appropriate educational technology; and that students and faculty learn to become critical users of information technology.

Funding

  • The campus technology infrastructure shall maintain parity with like institutions. CSUSB shall monitor like institutions and maintain parity in IT equipment and personnel.

Governance

  • CSUSB will continue to address information technology issues through wide-based campus involvement.

Over a period of seven months, the TAC Sub-Committees met independently and reviewed data as they applied to their respective areas. Recommendations for Immediate Action Steps that could be undertaken over the next two-year period are reproduced below.

Baseline Access Training & Support

  1. Smart Classrooms: Develop a timeline for determining number of remaining classrooms that need to be made "smart", ongoing assessment of usage in those rooms, and augmentation to current technology (such as wireless antennas), in addition to establishing a cycle and budget for upgrading the equipment to keep the classrooms as current as necessary.
  2. Expand the role of the BATS to: a) better reflect its role in facilitating access to technology for teaching and learning; and b) recommend technology directions for the campus, particularly as they impact teaching and learning.
  3. Bring forward a student technology fee referendum to guarantee a steady source of funding for technology for teaching and learning.
  4. Assess in-progress "new technology" initiatives and recommend areas for expansion to support teaching and learning while optimizing access with moderate cost.
  5. Continue to evaluate and pilot test strategies to maximize access to Smart Classrooms, computer labs, and new technologies.
  6. Devise a strategy to monitor student lab use (possible ways: software installed on lab computers, or surveys required of labs planning to request future upgrade funds).
  7. Continue to pursue campus input into student technology issues, while providing both easy-to-use resources (access) and awareness of (communication) technology tools.

Infrastructure

  1. Plan for on-going replacement and support for infrastructure and licensing agreements. Telecommunications and Network Services, Academic Computing and Media Services and Data Center Services need to develop a complete inventory of all infrastructure components. Using the inventory as a basis, develop a replacement/upgrade cycle, determine annual maintenance/licensing costs. Once all of the above is accomplished an estimated annual budget needs to be developed along with any known source of funds.
  2. Plan for optimal staffing level for technical staff to support IT in all units on campus. This element is probably best accomplished with a consulting firm who has experience in IT staffing. An inventory will need to be made of all current IT positions, their job responsibilities, and their current skill sets. A separate analysis will have to be accomplished on the IT staffing needs of the university to obtain a gap analysis.
  3. Plan for a converged telecommunications infrastructure. A converged telecommunications infrastructure is inevitable where voice, video and data communications will take place over the same network as opposed to the current model of separate wiring and switching for each of the elements. This will require planning, study, preparation and training to insure the convergence is accomplished with as little or no degradation in service and features. A joint plan by TNS and ACM needs to be developed to insure this is accomplished.
  4. Seek out and implement tools and infrastructure that support collaboration. The first step will be to define just what kind of collaboration is to take place. This would be an academic and administrative exercise as there are two or more different needs. Once collaboration is defined an appropriate group such as BATS should do exploratory work as to the software that is available to meet the needs.
  5. Make the electronic borders between classroom, student housing, home and roaming invisible. This element will take planning and exploration as the technology is not sufficiently complete to accomplish this task.
  6. Thin-client technologies. This would be a good project for BATS to explore to determine if it is a direction that the university wants to go and if so what is the best technology to support our mission.
  7. Develop a Telecommunications Master Plan. With the number of new building projects projected over the next ten years, this becomes important so that new growth in telecommunications will not create additional, unexpected burdens regarding personnel, equipment, and other similar items.

University Information Systems

  1. Coordinate oversight, and plan for development and implementation of a seamless university information system.
  2. Expand training opportunities for all university technical staff.
  3. Continue building digital library.

Teaching and Learning

  1. Expand training opportunities to include regular and periodic training for students, staff, faculty, and administrators.
  2. Encourage removal of disincentives and putting in place incentives to encourage and reward faculty and staff in the use of technology for teaching, research, and service. This would include encouraging the Faculty Senate review of the current Criteria for Performance Review to specifically address the concerns of faculty using technology in instruction.
  3. Fund faculty research projects which are designed to assess the effectiveness of various uses of technology in instruction.
  4. Implement or reinforce information literacy programs in the general education program.
  5. Encourage that technology skills and technology integration be part of faculty, staff, and administrators' professional development plans (annual or as per unit's evaluation time period), and be evaluated and rewarded accordingly.

Distance Learning

  1. Develop business and academic accountability model plan for distance learning programs.
  2. Insure that distance-learning students have appropriate access to student services.
  3. Insure valid assessment procedures for class outcomes.
  4. Insure valid assessment procedures for program outcomes.
  5. Expand course and program availability for students.

Community

  1. Establish an advisory committee to assess needs and identify opportunities for technological collaborations.
  2. Cooperatively establish and offer an information competency tutoring program for area high schools and community colleges.
  3. Establish a study committee to recommend policies for establishing collaborative partnerships.

There are a number of key issues that continue to be addressed by the campus. The BATS Committee, in its report to the TAC, sums these up nicely: The campus climate for change involves not only providing access to equipment, but also educating faculty, staff, students. A perennial campus problem is inadequate technical support for technology (too few staff and/or too little staff training) in many areas. Students use campus computer labs primarily for convenience while on campus, followed by access to specialty software/hardware, and about half of them would bring or buy laptops, if campus resources/wireless networking were readily available. Fourth, the majority of students want campus technology dollars to go to supporting student labs, not to assist them in purchasing their own computers. Fifth, smart classrooms are widely popular with faculty and with students, and most students believe they learn more with the assistance of a 'smart' facility. Sixth, successful technology initiatives include a well-designed and evaluated 'pilot' phase." The new Technology Strategic Plan attempts to provide solutions to address these and other key issues related to technology on the CSUSB campus.

Appendix of Supporting Materials and Links for Theme II, Issue No. 4

Reports (Available in hardcopy on-campus):

Technology Strategic Plan, 2002/03 - 2004/05: http://irt.csusb.edu/tacwww

Interim DRAFT Technology Strategic Plan, 2001/02

IRT Strategic Plans: http://irt.csusb.edu
2002/03
2001/02
2000/01
1999/2000
1998/99

Smart Classroom Project

Title V Grant. Improving Access to Information Systems at Hispanic Serving Institutions: A Cooperative Arrangement Project

Baseline Access Training and Support
BATS Report, 2001/2002
Committee List 1999/2000
Charge to the 1998/99 Committee
Letter to President Karnig re: BATS Implementation Committee
1996/97 Follow Up Report
1996/97 Original BATS Document

Technology Surveys
Winter 2002 Student Registration Survey, conducted Fall 2001
Smart Classroom Faculty Survey, November 2001
Technology Resources Survey of Faculty, December 2001
Student Survey (conducted by electronic mail), January 2002
Faculty Assessment of Library Services, April 2002

Telecommunications Infrastructure Initiative (TII). TII information is located at: http://tii.calstate.edu/BuildoutProject/InfrastructureBuildout.shtml

Wireless Networks Common Management System (CMS): http://cms.csusb.edu

Other Useful Links

Academic Computing and Media Home Page: http://acm.csusb.edu

Administrative Computing Services: http://acs.csusb.edu

CSU Common Management System: http://cms.calstate.edu

CSUSB Common Management System: http://cms.csusb.edu

Data Center Services Home Page: http://helpweb.csusb.edu

Office of Distributed Learning: http://odl.csusb.edu

CSUSB Information Resources & Technology: http://irt.csusb.edu

Information Security Office: http://www.infosec.csusb.edu
Information Security Policies and Information
Contact Information for Information Security Office
Campus Resources
Incident Reports
Title V Grant Information. Improving Access to Information Systems at Hispanic Serving Institutions: A Cooperative Arrangement Project

CSU Information Technology Services: http://its.calstate.edu

Pfau Library Home Page: http://www.lib.csusb.edu

Secure IT Conference: http://www.secureitconf.com

Teaching Resource Center: http://trc.csusb.edu

Technology Day 2002: http://irt.csusb.edu

Technology Surveys: http://irt.csusb.edu/tacwww

The 1999 CSU Technology Survey: http://ir.csusb.edu/1999techsurvey.html

Telecommunications and Network Services: http://tns.csusb.edu

Water Resources Institute: http://wri.csusb.edu


Acrobat Adobe Reader Get Acrobat Viewer   California State University, San Bernardino
5500 University Parkway
San Bernardino CA 92407-2318
Tel. 909-537-5000